PogoWasRight.org

Privacy News and Issues

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Snapshot for Healthcare Employers: What AI Glasses Mean for Patient Privacy and Recording Consent

Posted on October 29, 2026 by Dissent

Elysse Gorney and Brett Owens of Fisher Phillips write:

An employee walks into an exam room wearing AI glasses and asks the device to summarize the visit. Before the encounter ends, the patient’s description of symptoms, medical history, and treatment discussion could be transmitted to an outside AI platform. Without robust policies and procedures in place, the patient may never realize a recording occurred, and the employer may not know where the information went. Whether using video or audio-only recording, AI glasses present the same concern: sensitive patient information can leave the exam room if you don’t take proper precautions.

Scenarios like the one above raise various legal and data security issues in healthcare settings, which we’ll address in more detail below.

1. Address consent before recording begins.

Establish a consistent process for explaining what will be recorded, why, whether an outside AI service will process it, where it will be stored, and how long it will be retained. Have counsel review applicable recording-consent requirements and any separate HIPAA authorization requirements, including how consent or authorization will be documented.

Staff should know how to respond when a patient declines or withdraws permission. Shared rooms and treatment bays deserve particular attention because recordings may capture neighboring patients, family members, or interpreters. Clear communication also matters for patient trust: patients may hesitate to discuss sensitive concerns if they do not know who will have access to the recording.

Read more at JDSupra.

 

Category: Artificial IntelligenceHealthcare

Post navigation

← Oregon Attorney General Rayfield Leads States in $220M Settlement With GM Over Sale of Drivers’ Private Data
A RIZAP Employee Uploaded 726 People’s Health Records to a Personal AI Chat →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Contact Me

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Loblaw commits to strengthening security measures following privacy breach
  • Privacy Rights Can’t Be Left in the Rearview: Attorney General Bonta Secures $1.8 Million Settlement with Lyft
  • A RIZAP Employee Uploaded 726 People’s Health Records to a Personal AI Chat
  • Snapshot for Healthcare Employers: What AI Glasses Mean for Patient Privacy and Recording Consent
  • Oregon Attorney General Rayfield Leads States in $220M Settlement With GM Over Sale of Drivers’ Private Data
  • UK: Action taken against Staffordshire Police after victim’s address wrongly disclosed to alleged abuser
  • Northern District of California Finds No Concrete Injury Despite A Lack of Consent

RSS feed: Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Syrian Man Sentenced for Wide-Ranging Hacking Conspiracy Conducted on Behalf of the Bashar Al Assad Regime
  • A Defense Contractor Gave Their Personal AI Agent Access to a Secure Pentagon System
  • Hackers hit UNM hospital, then apologize and offer patients $2,500. In a new statement, they reveal more about the incident.
  • HHS’ Office for Civil Rights Settles Ransomware Investigation of Lehigh Valley Health Network
  • UK: Second Liverpool hospital investigates staff over breach of Southport attack patient records

Want to Get PogoWasRight’s RSS Feed?

 

It’s at https://pogowasright.org/feed/

©2026 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.